356 days: How long Department of Education has sat on anti-male bias complaint against UNC System

No update since December

 

Nearly a year after filing a federal complaint alleging anti-male bias in sexual misconduct investigations across the University of North Carolina System, a “men’s human rights organization” is still waiting for official action.

 

The National Coalition for Men Carolinas filed the complaint in early March with the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. It alleges widespread deprivation of due process and mistreatment of male students and employees in Title IX investigations at the system’s 16 schools.

 

Former UNC-Chapel Hill wrestling coach C.D. Mock helped file the complaint. The university fired him in 2015 – and replaced him with an inexperienced coach – months before a court cleared Mock’s son of wrongdoing in a sexual assault investigation at the University of Tennessee-Chattanooga.

 

The coach blamed his firing on his outspoken public criticism of Title IX investigations that lacked due process, rather than the poor team performance cited by UNC. Mock joined NCFM Carolinas as a board member and spokesperson last year.

 

NCFM Carolinas has received limited correspondence from OCR in the 11-plus months since filing the complaint, President Gregory Josefchuk said in a phone interview Thursday.

 

He showed The College Fix some of his emails with Sara Clash-Drexler, senior attorney in OCR’s D.C. regional office, going back to April when she told him she would be evaluating the complaint.

 

‘It is beyond frustrating to not receive a determination’ after 11-plus months

 

In a Sept. 30 email to Clash-Drexler, Josefchuk referred to a July 11 message from the attorney that said the evaluation of the complaint was ”currently making its way through our internal review process.”

 

That means OCR “has yet to provide a notice of determination into the discriminatory practices we’ve identified (and submitted corroborating evidence)” in the 7 months since the complaint had been filed, he told Clash-Drexler.

 

Josefchuk emailed her again Oct. 3 to ask if Clash-Drexler got his Sept. 30 email. She acknowledged Josefchuk’s Nov. 15 voicemail in an email the same day, telling him the case was still under review: “I have made others aware of your frustration, and I will be sure to update you as soon as I am able.”

 

Josefchuk said he got his last response from Clash-Drexler in December. She wrote that she expected to hear something from her superiors “relatively soon” on whether OCR would open an investigation.

 

He sent more emails in January and most recently on Tuesday, copying Secretary Betsy DeVos*, OCR chief Kenneth Marcus and his enforcement director, Alice Wender. Josefchuk briefly summarized the complaint.

 

“It is beyond frustrating to not receive a determination on a complaint that has provided ample evidence of systemic discrimination (based on sex),” he wrote, warning department leaders that NCFM Carolinas was “now asking our friends in Congress to look into this matter.”

 

Josefchuk told The Fix that voicemails left with OCR have also been ignored since December.

 

The complaint is “stuck in limbo,” he said, and the halting communication and lack of developments in nearly a year was “very disappointing.”

 

Given DeVos’s Title IX rulemaking and interest in reforming campus proceedings, Josefchuk said he would have expected the complaint to be “high on their list.”

 

According to its list of pending cases under investigation at “elementary-secondary and post-secondary schools,” last updated Feb. 1, OCR has 1,458 open sex-discrimination cases.

 

The Department of Education did not respond to a Fix query two weeks ago. It responded to a voicemail on Wednesday and requested information in an email that could then be forwarded to OCR. No further responses have been received.

 

UNC investigators ‘routinely fail to provide impartiality’

 

The complaint claims that UNC “systematically” denies accused students the ability to “participate in or benefit from the school’s programs or activities,” as well as due process in Title IX investigations.

 

The system creates “a hostile environment for accused male students,” and has used short-term suspensions as “a weapon” that is designed to “remove and punish” them.

 

UNC investigators “routinely fail to provide impartiality to accused male students during a sexual misconduct or harassment investigation because of sex-based institutional bias,” the complaint continues, citing “information and belief.”

 

The complaint cites multiple recent court cases where accused students have seen success in lawsuits against their schools for due process violations that led to their discipline. It alleges that UNC has not been following the interim guidance issued by DeVos in September 2017, who rescinded the previous administration’s “Dear Colleague” letters on Title IX enforcement.

 

Two email requests for comment to the UNC System, a week apart, were not returned.

 

*Disclosure

 

Read more at: https://www.thecollegefix.com/356-days-how-long-department-of-education-has-sat-on-anti-male-bias-complaint-against-unc-system/

 

Please reload

Featured Posts

The Factual Feminist - Title IX and the scorched earth campaign against men's sports

June 25, 2014

1/8
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us

Proudly made by Wix.com

Contact us: 

National Coalition For Men Carolinas

P.O. Box 274

Sherrills Ford, NC 28673-7311

 

TEL: (828) 478-2281

ncfmcarolinas@yahoo.com  

 

Disclaimer: This website compiles information for distribution as a public service. The information distributed does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Coalition For Men Carolinas.The information contained on this website is strictly for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent legal advice.