University gives up trying to punish accused male after appeals court thrashing over ‘1000 girls’ remark

May 11, 2018

‘Stipulation of dismissal’ on the way

 

Denison University can see the writing on the wall, and there’s no reason to be a loser when you can just be a quitter.

 

The private Ohio university decided to quit rather than lose an appeal before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals regarding its expulsion of a student accused of rape via incapacitation.

 

A trial court had dismissed a lawsuit by “John Doe” against Denison that claimed the university created “a gender biased, hostile environment against males” by disciplining them when they “accept physical contact initiated by female students.”

 

But one of the three appellate judges hearing the case, Amul Thapar, thoroughly lit into Denison’s attorney  during oral argument six months ago. The totality of the judges’ remarks suggested the panel would rule against the university 2-1 and reinstate the Title IX lawsuit against Denison, bringing the 6th Circuit in line with the 2nd Circuit on the matter of anti-male bias in Title IX proceedings.

 

Denison’t isn’t waiting to find out. A May 4 document to the parties’ lawyers from a 6th Circuit mediator says that “as discussed,” the parties can now file a stipulation to dismiss, which is due by June 1.

 

It’s worth returning to that oral argument to see what college administrators can get away with, even with trial judges:

 

Denison lawyer Natalie McLaughlin suggested the university can discriminate against accused males to avoid getting sued by females.

 

She waved off an alleged statement by the chair of the Title IX panel that her colleagues must consider the “future of 1000 girls” before rendering judgment – a clear presumption of guilt. (Thapar asked McLaughlin what she’d say if a “Black Lives Matter defendant” were accused of assaulting a white male.)

 

When McLaughlin realized she was cornered, she argued from authority: Only the chair appeared to be biased against John Doe, and such panels are “entitled to a presumption of impartiality.”

 

She then said bias doesn’t matter at the trial level if the decision is upheld on appeal by unbiased campus parties.

 

After this disastrous appearance before the 6th Circuit, the only remaining question is why Denison didn’t try to settle months earlier.

 

Legal observers are sad they won’t get to see a stunning smackdown of Denison’s position from Judge Thapar.

 

Slate legal writer Mark Joseph Stern has previously criticized fellow progressives for junking due process in sexual misconduct cases, including the Obama administration’s now-rescinded Title IX guidance. Such preference for mob rule also targets poor people of color, he has written.

 

Read more at: https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/44827/

Please reload

Featured Posts

The Factual Feminist - Title IX and the scorched earth campaign against men's sports

June 25, 2014

1/8
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us

Proudly made by Wix.com

Contact us: 

National Coalition For Men Carolinas

P.O. Box 274

Sherrills Ford, NC 28673-7311

 

TEL: (828) 478-2281

ncfmcarolinas@yahoo.com  

 

Disclaimer: This website compiles information for distribution as a public service. The information distributed does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Coalition For Men Carolinas (NCFMC).The information contained on this website is strictly for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent legal advice.