UVA Dean’s Defamation Case Against Rolling Stone Will Go to Trial

September 22, 2016

A United States District Court has denied Rolling Stone‘s petition to dismiss a defamation lawsuit stemming from story, “A Rape on Campus,” penned by Sabrina Rubin Erdely.


Judge Glen E. Conrad of the US  District Court of the Western District of Virginia, ruled against Rolling Stone and Erdely’s Motion for Summary Judgment, noting that there is certainly a question of fact as to whether the magazine — and the author — knew or should have known that “Jackie,” who claimed to have been gang-raped by a UVA fraternity, was lying about her sexual assault.


UVA Associate Dean Nicole Erasmo brought the lawsuit, claiming that she, among others, had been unfairly maligned when Erdely reported that Erasmo failed to follow up on Jackie’s claims and turned a blind eye to what Erdely considered an epidemic of sexual assault on UVA’s campus.


The opinion, which is 26 pages long, examines Rolling Stone‘s and Erdely’s claims in detail, acknowledging that Erdely relied extensively on Jackie’s account of how UVA handled her sexual assault claim, and that Eramo suffered as a result.


While Rolling Stone did publish a retraction, blaming Jackie for “misleading” Erdely into maligning Eramo, Judge Conrad noted that there was enough evidence that a court could, in the light most favorable to Eramo, find that Erdely should have known Jackie’s story was inconsistent, and possibly incredible.


Since these questions of fact do exist, Judge Conrad said that he could not simply dismiss Eramo’s claims of defamation, actual malice, and republication out of hand.


He did, however, dismiss one of Eramo’s claims against Rolling Stone and Erdely, finding that Eramo, at least, was a “limited purpose public figure” (rather than a private citizen) at the time Rolling Stone published their article.


The court found that she was a public figure largely because she was vocal in her position, assessing students’ claims of sexual harassment and sexual violence. Subsequently, she had some access to media, allowing her to potentially mitigate damages she might have suffered at Rolling Stone‘s and Erdely’s hands.


The court will now set a date for trial, and it’s likely Erdely (and others) may have to testify.

Read more at: 






Please reload

Featured Posts

The Factual Feminist - Title IX and the scorched earth campaign against men's sports

June 25, 2014

Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us

Proudly made by Wix.com

Contact us: 

National Coalition For Men Carolinas

P.O. Box 274

Sherrills Ford, NC 28673-7311


TEL: (828) 478-2281



Disclaimer: This website compiles information for distribution as a public service. The information distributed does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Coalition For Men Carolinas (NCFMC).The information contained on this website is strictly for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent legal advice.