Campus sexual assault: The only crime where due process is shunned By Ashe Schow

September 5, 2014

 

 

In a report about those accused of sexual assault suing their universities, National Public Radio correspondent Tovia Smith interviewed a lawyer for accusers who suggested those men needed to evolve and get over that pesky due process thing.

 

According to Smith’s paraphrasing, attorney Colby Bruno suggested the fact that “a lot of young men are suing their schools doesn't mean the process is actually unfair – only that it suggests some students are having trouble adjusting to the changing norms on campus sexual assault.”

Bruno perpetuated the “guilty until proven innocent” mantra against those accused of sexual assault that is permeating college campuses.

 

Don't have sympathy for the guy who assaults somebody and thinks he's been railroaded,” Bruno said. “The cases where students are deluding themselves into thinking that what they did wasn't rape and sexual assault? I think those are 85 percent of boys coming forward saying, 'I was railroaded.’ ”

 

Of course, Bruno has no more proof of her 85 percent claim than I have to say 85 percent of college women are turning regrets and failed relationships into rape or sexual assault.

 

Smith also interviewed Annie Clark, labeled as “a student survivor turned activist.”

 

“If a survivor is told that they would have to face their rapist, and that person would be allowed to interrogate them, that could absolutely have a chilling effect,” Clark said.

 

If due process were included in campus sexual assault hearings, however, the accuser would have a right to counsel as well. The accuser would have someone helping them through the ordeal, preparing them for the cross-examination. Though all the preparation in the world won’t make it easier for accusers to face those who they believe assaulted them, that fear shouldn’t be the basis to remove due process rights from another person.

 

Schools should continue looking for ways to make accusers feel more comfortable reporting a crime – whether to police or to campus administrators. But that comfort should not be obtained by hamstringing the accused and labeling them guilty before they’ve even had a chance to make their cases.

 

With so many campus sexual assault reports coming down to “he said, she said,” automatically taking one side’s word over the other will never provide justice — for either party.

Smith ends her report with an interesting idea — that different levels of due process be used depending on the potential punishment.

 

“For example, a student accused of misconduct, who might only be required to change dorms, may be entitled to less due process than someone facing the more severe punishment of expulsion — which might permanently mar his record and impact his life,” Smith wrote.

 

That could be an acceptable compromise, because in the current landscape, expelling a student — an act that ruins futures — without allowing them to tell their side of the story or provide their own evidence is what’s leading to more and more lawsuits.

 

See more at: http://washingtonexaminer.com/campus-sexual-assault-the-only-crime-where-due-process-is-shunned/article/2552867#.VAjmf0nZX-c.twitter

 

Please reload

Featured Posts

The Factual Feminist - Title IX and the scorched earth campaign against men's sports

June 25, 2014

1/8
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us

Proudly made by Wix.com

Contact us: 

National Coalition For Men Carolinas

P.O. Box 274

Sherrills Ford, NC 28673-7311

 

TEL: (828) 478-2281

ncfmcarolinas@yahoo.com  

 

Disclaimer: This website compiles information for distribution as a public service. The information distributed does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Coalition For Men Carolinas (NCFMC).The information contained on this website is strictly for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent legal advice.